Skip to content

Atta vs Zip

Zip is a procurement platform that takes in purchase requests and routes them through approvals and vendor onboarding. Atta covers the approval step too, then the agent finds the item, pays with a capped single-use card and places the order. Pick Zip for a procurement team's workflow, Atta when you want the purchase done.

Updated November 6, 2026 · By

What Zip does well

Zip sits in the intake-to-procure category. A request comes in through a form, gets routed to the people who must sign off, and the process around a new vendor (reviews, contracts, onboarding) is tracked in one place. Teams with a procurement or legal function use that kind of tool to keep a consistent path for larger, contract-backed purchases. It's a good fit when the work is coordination between departments.

Where Atta differs

Atta follows a purchase from the first message to the invoice. The sequence:

  • Someone asks in Slack, WhatsApp, ChatGPT, Claude or the browser.
  • The agent searches the stores the workspace allows and shows the item, price and delivery date.
  • A policy function decides auto, ask or deny from the amount, the person's role, the budget left and the workspace's rules. Code makes that call, not the model.
  • Over a limit, an approval chain is built and answered one approver at a time. The approval binds to the amount and the lines, and a changed cart fails the order with both figures.
  • With a card program on, the agent pays with a single-use virtual card for that order, capped at the approved total on the issuer's side too. Without one, it hands over the checkout link.
  • Checkout reserves the budget and payment settles it. A received invoice links to the PO it names.

The agent places the order. If placing it fails after approval, it waits for a person to press Try again, and a spend is never retried automatically.

Side by side

AttaZip
A request starts asA message in Slack, WhatsApp, ChatGPT, Claude or the browserA form or intake flow
Finding the itemThe agent searches your allowed storesThe requester brings the vendor
ApprovalChain built from amount and rules, enforced in code before paymentWorkflow routing
Vendor review and contractsNot what Atta doesCore of the category

One order

Here's the same request in Atta. Dana asks in Slack for 10 monitor arms. The agent finds them at $42 each, $420 total, arriving Thursday. That's under Dana's limit, so her yes is the approval, and the agent pays with a card capped at $420. There's no vendor onboarding step because the store is one the workspace already allows. A purchase that needs a new vendor reviewed is the kind to send to a procurement platform.

When to pick Zip instead

Zip is the better fit when:

  • You have a procurement team and the hard part is routing requests, security and legal reviews and vendor onboarding between departments.
  • Your purchases are contract-backed and run through a sourcing process, not a store checkout.
  • You want one system of record for a long vendor approval process, and a person doing the buying is fine.

Using both

Atta covers the purchases someone can ask for in a sentence. Other spend can stay where it is. Atta is in invite-only beta and free during the beta.

Questions

Is Atta a Zip replacement?

For small and repeat purchases, it can be. Atta takes the request, gets approvals and buys. If your process depends on vendor reviews and contract workflows, a procurement platform like Zip covers work Atta doesn't.

Can I use Atta alongside a procurement platform?

Yes. You can keep a platform for contracted spend and use Atta for the purchases that never reach a procurement team.

Who places the order?

In Atta the agent does, after the approvals pass and with a capped single-use card, or it hands you the checkout link if there's no card program.

Related